Growth implants are among the most researched and cost-effective technologies in the beef industry. However, adoption on Canadian cow-calf operations remains relatively low, despite similar performance and economic benefits seen in backgrounding and feedlot cattle.
Questions around labour, economics, animal health, and confidence in the implant procedure often influence producer decisions.
These issues were the focus of a recent Beef Cattle Research Council webinar, “To Implant or Not? What Cow-Calf Producers Need to Know,” featuring Dr. Lauren Younker of TELUS Agriculture and Manitoba beef producer Betty Green of G7 Ranch. The discussion combined research, practical advice, and real-world experience to help producers evaluate whether implants fit their operation.
Growth implants are small hormone-containing pellets placed just under the skin on the back of the ear. The compounds mimic naturally occurring hormones to support lean muscle growth and improved feed efficiency.
There is no withdrawal time, as ears are removed at processing and do not enter the food system.

Explaining how implants function in pasture-based systems, Younker noted they help cattle make better use of existing nutrition.
“What it’s doing is essentially helping your calves use the nutrients they’re consuming on pasture to turn into more lean growth and more pounds for you as a producer at weaning time,” she says.
She emphasized that implants are not a replacement for strong management practices, but rather a tool to complement vaccination programs, biosecurity, and balanced nutrition.
Not all implants are the same. There are three primary hormone compounds used, each with different potency levels and applications:
Due to these differences, producers are encouraged to work with their veterinarian to match implant type with production stage.
“Most cow-calf producers would implant at branding with either a progestin or an estrogen-type implant,” says Younker. “Androgen implants are better suited for later production stages when energy intake is higher.”
One of the strongest arguments for implants is return on investment.
Implants can:
“We always talk about implants in the feedlot world, and in cow-calf too, as being one of the highest ROIs that we can have,” says Younker. “They are the most consistent profit driver available.”
For cow-calf producers, this typically means heavier calves at weaning without significantly increasing costs.
Research from the University of Manitoba also indicates environmental benefits, including:
Implants are most effective when combined with strong management fundamentals. Key factors include:
“Cattle that have a better plane of nutrition will have a better response to that implant,” says Younker.
Correct placement is also critical. Poor technique can reduce effectiveness and impact animal welfare.
Producers should follow these steps to ensure correct implant placement:
Betty Green, co-owner of G7 Ranch in Manitoba, has used implants for more than 30 years.
She notes that consistency and attention to detail are essential.
“Consistency in implant procedures and attention to detail are important to ensure both animal welfare and performance outcomes,” she says.
Her experience reinforces that implants work best when integrated into a broader management system aligned with production goals.
Producers looking to learn more, including considerations around implanting heifers and fertility, are encouraged to review additional resources and consult with their veterinarian to make informed decisions for their operation.
Tap the menu button next to the address bar or at the bottom of your browser.
Select ‘Install’ or ‘Add to Homescreen’ to stay connected.
Share this article on
About the Author
The Beef Cattle Research Council (BCRC) is Canada’s national industry-led funding agency for beef, cattle and forage research. The BCRC is funded through a portion of a producer-paid national levy as well as government and industry funding, and is directed by a committee of beef producers from across the country. Find out More